L'Humanité in English
Translation of selective papers from the french daily newspaper l'Humanité
decorHome > World > Reforms, or what is really at stake in the Bolivian ballot on (...)
 

EditorialWorldPoliticsEconomySocietyCultureScience & TechnologySport"Tribune libre"Comment and OpinionTranslators’ CornerLinksBlog of Cynthia McKennonBlog of Tom GillBlog of Hervé FuyetBlog of Kris WischenkamperBlog of Gene ZbikowskiBlog of G. AshaBlog of Joseph M. Cachia Blog of Peggy Cantave Fuyet
About Elections, read also
decorLabour candidate Sadiq Khan is elected mayor of London decorThe 99%: pleading on behalf of the ’us’ in politics decor“Greece Has a New Government!” decorLeft Front Able to Form Parliamentary Group in French National Assembly decorMarie-George Buffet Condemns “Blackmailing of Greek People” decorLouka Katseli: “Economic Policy Must Change” decorRena Dourou: Dubious Political Geometry of Greek Right decorSyriza at Heart of Greek Politics Despite Pressure decorGerman Right Thinks Greece Should Leave Euro Zone decorMélenchon wants to "pit fraternity against hatred" decorAlexis Tsipras: “Syriza, Hope of an Entire People” decorGreeks to Vote Again in June
About Bolivia, read also
decorÁlvaro Garcia Linera: "Our ambition is a communitarian, post-capitalist society decorBolivia. « It is different from corrupt presidents who have done nothing for the poor people ». decor"Morales’ Victory should lead to a change of course for Bolivia" decorAn open letter from Evo Morales to the European Parliament decor“Reyes’s Murder Aimed at Triggering a Regional Crisis” decorBolivia Takes Back Control of its Natural Gas decorBolivia’s Oligarchy Heightens Tensions
World

Reforms, or what is really at stake in the Bolivian ballot on Sunday

Translated Monday 11 August 2008, by Henry Crapo

Proclaiming equality among communities and between men and women, Evo Morales is fiercely fought by the right wing and the oligarchy.

For the first time in the history of Bolivia, the highest officers of the state: the president, the vice-president and the prefects (regional governors) place their positions in the balance, this 10th of August, in a revocatory referendum. On the outcome of these consultations depends the pursuit of reforms engaged by Evo Morales, three years after the electoral victory that constituted a veritable rupture in a land until then marked by the racist heritage of colonialism.

If the referendum fails, it is the neo-liberal and reactionary right, in the form of the Podemos coalition, that will take back their control of the reins of government.

According to recent surveys, Evo Morales and his vice-president Alavaro Garcia Linera, have no need to be worried. Even more so, since the percentage of negative votes required for revocation is 53.7%, the score obtained by Evo Morales in the 2005 presidential election.

In the event of possible revocation of prefects, the authorities will name their replacements before any departmental elections are held.

In La Paz, the people hope that the referendum will bring some health to a poisonous political and institutional climate. The determined opposition to the government, organized by the MAS (Movement toward Socialism) these past three years, has retarded the application of reforms and the creation of a new constitution. It ferociously polarizes political life. Acts of violence are so numerous that the general secretary of the Organization of American States, José Miguel Insulza, made known his "profound preoccupation" on the eve of the referendum.

Is a return to normality possible? This is exactly what is in question these next few days. Especially since the key question of the Bolivian crisis, the transformational reforms and the rhythm of their application, will continue to be pointedly posed.

There is also no reason that the conglomerate of oppositional forces (the right wing, big land owners, and heads of industry), determined to preserve their self-proclaimed financial privileges, will change their strategy. It was just so, reckoning by that very social fracture, that there were held four illegal referenda for autonomy of regions in the east of the country, precisely where its principal economic resources are located.

True to their racist traditions, the whites and rich mixed-race minority, in their view, should not spend a penny on the hordes of Indians. And this, starting with a refusal to fund the president and his government, which have the support of the social organisms, themselves animated by a desire to bring about an equitable distribution of wealth.


Follow site activity RSS 2.0 | Site Map | Translators’ zone | SPIP