Budget. Michel Sapin wants to make security rhyme with austerity
CGT Air France. All the violence dooms them.
Justice: how the Macron law grants out impunity to bosses
No Terrorists, But Lunatics
Austerity Spoiled Economic Growth Over Last Six Months
OECD Pits Active Workers Against Retirees
“We Never…!”: The French Bourgeoisie’s Shameful Collaboration With the Nazis
Socialist Party Seeks to Close Ranks Behind European Budget Pact
The Cult Film and Documentary Maker Chris Marker Has Passed Away
Workers’ Rights Notably Absent From the French Government’s Plan For the Car Industry
The CGT Calls Mittal’s London Olympic Honors "Obscene"
PSA’s Restructuring Plan Spells a Social And Political Upheaval
Cédric Villani: “The State will no longer seek to impose its own version.”
The Spinetta Report, a Catastophic Scenario for the Railways
Increasing number of challenges to the government’s tax regime
"A Filthy Communist, He Has To Disappear"
The Unions at Alstom Refuse to Vote
2018, a Year of High Risk for the Railway
How the face of the Middle East Changed - A century after the Balfour Declaration
Pesticides. The vexing subject of glyphosate
Bastille solidarity market shows fruit and vegetables don’t have to be a privilege
Future of France’s Front National: Interview with political scientist Jean-Yves Camus
Emmanuel Macron is mainly strong due to the weaknesses of his opponents
En Marche! and France insoumise – “modernity” put to the test
ORIGINAL FRENCH ARTICLE: Un tour de passé-passe fiscal au benefice des patrons
by Max Staat
French Bosses Might Profit from a « Green » Fiscal Trick
A real hold-up might well be taking place before us.
Translated Saturday 25 July 2009, by and reviewed by Bill Scoble
The planned carbon tax is meant to make French people compensate for that portion of the local tax on businesses (Taxe Professionnelle) that is shortly to be slashed. Is a hold-up actually taking place before our eyes? The question is well worth asking in view of the first concrete provisions that have been made public to reform the local tax on businesses; indeed, the main benefit of those provisions will go to businesses; in addition to that, the first recommendations concerning the carbon tax will hit consumers mostly.
The link between the two proposed reforms owes little to chance, for it has its origin in statements Sarkozy made earlier this year. In order to “lighten taxes on businesses” so as to protect jobs and job creation, he proposed “doing away with the local tax on businesses”, and seeing the general outcry among local councillors, immediately declared that this tax would be replaced with the carbon tax. Besides the fact that a tax cut (whether an exemption from the local tax or from the employers’ social contribution) has never dissuaded any firm from laying off workers or relocating production when shareholders’ interests are at stake, many councillors’ associations observed that replacing the local tax on businesses with the carbon tax would imply shifting the tax burden onto French households. Indeed 30 to 40% of that carbon tax might be borne by them.
To be sure, the government’s current propositions for the reform of the local tax on businesses are no longer a simple repeal of the tax; nor do they simply replace it with the carbon tax. Sarkozy’s government intends to cancel a large portion of the tax, that which targets plants and real estate, and replace it with a tax on the added value (VAT) with progressive rates depending on turnover. This pleases the French employers’ association (MEDEF), for it means all the benefit will go to them. As for the jobs….
Indeed, those provisions will clearly not suffice to compensate for the fiscal losses incurred by local governments. These losses will have to be compensated for by state subsidies the relative value of which, as experience has taught local councillors, decreases year after year. This is bound to affect the diversity and the quality of local public services as well as the level of household taxes, to compensate for the losses.
But to increase state subsidies, the government - since it refuses to
increase the public deficit - needs new tax revenues. And new revenues are levied on French people and not on businesses, Sarkozy’s pet priority. Hence the carbon tax, which should be paid in part by households, and which will partly contribute what businesses will no longer supply thanks to the reform of the local tax on businesses. And so the two reforms add up right, following Sarkozy’s plan: fewer taxes for firms means more taxes for households.
