L'Humanité in English
Translation of selective papers from the french daily newspaper l'Humanité
decorHome > World > The Great Financial Institutions Support the Mubarak Régime
 

EditorialWorldPoliticsEconomySocietyCultureScience & TechnologySport"Tribune libre"Comment and OpinionTranslators’ CornerLinksBlog of Cynthia McKennonBlog of Tom GillBlog of Hervé FuyetBlog of Kris WischenkamperBlog of Gene ZbikowskiBlog of G. AshaBlog of Joseph M. Cachia Blog of Peggy Cantave Fuyet
About Egypt, read also
decorThe people’s way, editorial by Pierre Barbancey decorEgypt: "You saw all those young people, they dared to say no!" decorEgypt recalls its ambassador from Israel decorTribunal or Shadow Play? decorSocial Protest Is Rising in Egypt decorEgypt- From Nasser to Mubarak: a country under outside control decorEgypt : Wind of Revolt Against the High Cost of Living decor“The Muslim Brotherhood stands on the borderline between a brotherhood and a political party”
World

ORIGINAL FRENCH ARTICLE: La finance soutient le régime

by Pierre Ivorra

The Great Financial Institutions Support the Mubarak Régime

Translated Saturday 12 February 2011, by Isabelle Métral and reviewed by Henry Crapo

BNP Paribas economic experts said: “the political system is solid”. While the IMF vouched that “Egypt has made significant progress...”

“The political foundation constituted by the army and a widespread system of subsidies can at least temporarily hold off the régime’s potential destabilization.” So BNP Paribas economic experts maintained in a recent note dated January 28, 2011. “In our opinion the risks that the Egyptian regime might be destabilized should not be over-estimated,” they concluded. And yet those same experts’ assessment of the system was terribly incriminating: young people have “great difficulties in finding jobs, more than a third of them are unemployed” and “poverty is rampant among the 84 million inhabitants.”

Financial decision-makers lament the people’s destitution, but do their utmost to ensure the continuation of the policies that generate it. Such has been, for decades, the creed of the great international financial institutions concerning the régime. “Egypt has made significant progress by stepping up structural reforms beginning in 2004,” IMF experts vouchsafed in late March 2010.

The IMF has persistently encouraged the opening of the country to the multinationals’ greed for profits; it has applauded privatization measures for companies and public utilities, incited the Egyptian authorities to guarantee “greater flexibility on the labour market.” Under Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s leadership, the IMF lately “hailed the (Egyptian government’s) political response to the (global financial) crisis”, “the stimulus provided by targeted budgetary measures and successive cuts in interest rates,” but it soon invited the Egyptian government to implement “a drastic reduction of the budgetary deficit” and of public social expense.

Such blindness to the social effects of such policies also characterizes the other great international institutions. In 2007, the World Bank rated Egypt as the best country worldwide for pro-business reforms.” The OECD (the great capitalist countries’ club) noted in November 2010, one month and a half before the Egyptian people’s revolt, that “Egypt has made impressive progress in order to become more business-friendly over the last five years.” Yet the same US-dominated international institution declared to Egyptian leaders that “”Drastic reforms are yet needed in order to attract more massive foreign investments.”

Such is indeed the model promoted to Egyptian leaders by the dominating powers: ”to make Egypt a more attractive destination for national and foreign investors.” In addition to this, the OECD, IMF, and World Bank, but also the EU though the agreements it concluded with Mediterranean countries, have also ensured that Northern African and Middle-East countries wage a fratricide economic war. Witness a recent communiqué by the OECD: “competition between neighbouring countries has led to the adoption of vast reforms.”

“Divide and rule”: the old system is definitely out of breath!


Follow site activity RSS 2.0 | Site Map | Translators’ zone | SPIP