L'Humanité in English
Translation of selective papers from the french daily newspaper l'Humanité
decorHome > Politics > Esther Benbassa: “Returning common law to the judiciary is a must”
 

EditorialWorldPoliticsEconomySocietyCultureScience & TechnologySportInternational Communist and Labor Press"Tribune libre"Comment and OpinionBlogsLinks
About France, read also
decorSolidarity: 300,000 older people are “socially dead” decorDiplomacy from Atlanticism to Gaullism, Macron Embodies all the Lines decorAgribusiness. Intensive farming: Chicken Little was right decorFuture of France’s Front National: Interview with political scientist Jean-Yves Camus decorInequality still rife with one in five children living in poverty decorThe Assassination of Maurice Audin, a Crime d’État decorWith Emmanuel Macron as President, What to Expect? decorScience: What Was Grothendieck Thinking About? decor# France. What is next? decorThe Truth Concerning the Fiscal Program of Jean-Luc Mélenchon decorThe Level of Support for Jean-Luc Mélenchon is Frightening the Powerful decorJean-Luc Mélenchon, as President
About State of Emergency, read also
decorPresidential Election Under a State of Emergency decorJean-Pierre Bosino: “The unacceptable challenge to the separation of powers”
Politics

Esther Benbassa: “Returning common law to the judiciary is a must”

Interview by Sébastien Crépel

Translated Monday 11 January 2016, by Adrian Jordan

“Initially presented as a miracle cure against terrorism, the state of emergency has not advanced the fight against terrorism very much. Despite the thousands of searches, few arms have been found and, as a member of the parliamentary commission for monitoring the state of emergency, I am not certain of its utility. Though it enabled response at a time of anguish among the people, I do not support its prolongation. We do not have need for exceptional measures to act against arms and drug trafficking, and the state of emergency has not facilitated the capture of the fugitive responsible for the latest attacks. To entrench it within the Constitution would be to normalise this state of emergency, and I am not in favour of it. A permanent state of emergency, as sanctioned by its constitutionalisation, whatever one’s perspective, does not correspond with the rules of democracy. That would make the state of emergency matter of fact. We do not reassure people by intensifying anxiety and repeatedly saying we are at war, contrarily, this risks giving a little more weight to the National Front. We must go no further along the path to a martial, war-like, state: returning common law to the judiciary is a must if we wish to avoid future transgressions. Anyhow, they have already started, as with the arrest of ecologists on a rally. It would be more beneficial to enhance the intelligence services to make them better able to combat terrorism.

As for the rescission of nationality, it would be better for François Hollande to renounce this measure. We can now clearly see this was a manoeuvring tactic, ahead of the regional elections, to stave off the right and extreme right. Terrorists do not need dual-nationality to kill dozens of people. Equally, we are not going to introduce a two-tier citizenship in the name of necessity, just to expel three or four individuals! Togetherness as a nation is already hindered enough in this fashion without need to further divide the country.”


Follow site activity RSS 2.0 | Site Map | Translators’ zone | SPIP